Shell-vial culture and pp65 antigenemia assay in the detection of cytomegalovirus in the first blood sample of renal transplant recipients

1998 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Reina ◽  
Victoria Fernandez-Baca ◽  
Juan Saurina ◽  
Isabel Blanco ◽  
Maria Munar
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 3743-3745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen K. N. Ho ◽  
Fu-Keung Li ◽  
Kar-Neng Lai ◽  
Tak-Mao Chan

We compared the CMV Brite Turbo Kit (BT) and the Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA (version 2.0) assay (HC2) in the quantitation of pp65 antigenemia and cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA levels in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. Of 123 blood specimens collected from 24 renal transplant recipients, BT and HC2 assays detected 35 and 39 positive samples, respectively. The overall concordance rate between the two assays was 90%. Discordant results were observed at low levels of viremia, so that 8 samples were HC2 positive but BT negative and another 4 were BT positive but HC2 negative. There was good correlation (R 2 = 0.766; P < 0.01) between the levels of CMV DNA and pp65 antigenemia in the 31 concordant positive samples. Correlation between results obtained with the two assays was confirmed by longitudinal studies for a patient who developed clinical CMV disease. HC2 may be more sensitive at low viremia levels and allow earlier detection of impending CMV disease. The BT assay offered the advantage of a rapid (2-h) turnaround time. We conclude that BT and HC2 assays have similar sensitivity and efficacy in the diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infection and disease in renal transplant recipients. While the HC2 assay would be appropriate for centers that handle a large number of samples, the BT test may be more suitable for small sample numbers or when results are needed urgently.


1993 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREGOR Bein ◽  
ANDREAS Bitsch ◽  
JOCHEM Hoyer ◽  
JIIRGEN Steinhoff ◽  
LUTZ Fricke ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.J Goossens ◽  
M.J Blok ◽  
M.H.L Christiaans ◽  
P Sillekens ◽  
J.M Middeldorp ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-125
Author(s):  
D C Brennan ◽  
K A Garlock ◽  
B A Lippmann ◽  
R S Buller ◽  
M Gaudreault-Keener ◽  
...  

The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare preemptive to deferred treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in high-risk renal transplant recipients. Conducted at a university-affiliated transplant center, the study included 36 renal allograft recipients with donor or recipient CMV-seropositivity who received anti-thymocyte induction therapy. Ganciclovir was administered intravenously for 21 days upon detection of CMV viremia (preemptive, N = 15) or detection of CMV viremia associated with a CMV syndrome (deferred, N = 21). Shell vial culture, conventional culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed upon buffy-coat specimens weekly for 12 to 16 wk. CMV and non-CMV-associated charges were calculated. The comparative sensitivities of PCR, shell vial culture, and conventional culture were 91%, 44%, and 47%, respectively. A delay in specimen processing of > 24 h severely compromised the sensitivity of culture techniques but not that of PCR. Preemptive therapy tended to decrease symptomatic CMV episodes (0.4 versus 0.6 episodes per patient randomized; P = 0.22). One patient in each group had organ involvement, and no patient died. Allograft function and survival were similar. Ganciclovir use was increased in the preemptive group (1.2 versus 0.6 courses per patient randomized; P = 0.02). CMV-associated charges were $10,368 (preemptive) versus $5,752 (deferred); P = 0.13. PCR is superior to conventional monitoring to detect CMV viremia. Culture cannot be considered the "gold standard" for detection of CMV viremia, especially when transport of specimens over distances results in processing delays. Preemptive therapy may reduce symptomatic CMV infections in renal transplant recipients. It was associated with higher CMV-related charges but equivalent overall charges versus deferred treatment with intensive monitoring. Either strategy can achieve control of CMV infection after renal transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document